Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-749 - Potter v. City of Dothan, Alabama et al (CONSENT)


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-749 - Potter v. City of Dothan, Alabama et al (CONSENT)
December 20, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that the individual defendants' motion to dismiss the claims against them in their official capacities (doc. # 28) be and is hereby GRANTED, and the claims against Chief Parrish and Officers Traynham and Mock in their official capacities be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that the defendants motion to dismiss (doc. # 16) filed on October 11, 2016 be and is hereby DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 12/20/2016. (kh, )
May 12, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: It is ORDERED that the motion to compel (doc. # 47) be and is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:1. With respect to Request for Production # 1(k) to the City and Request forProduction # 5 to Mock and Traynoholm, the motion to compel be and is hereby GRANTED to the extent that the defendants shall produce any complaints of excessive force against the individually named defendants within three (3) years of the date of the incident that forms the basis of this lawsuit2. With respect to Request for Production # 11, the motion to compel be and ishereby GRANTED to the extent that the defendants shall produce any information from the individually named defendants' training files that relate to any use of force training they received within three (3) years of the date of the incident that forms the basis of this lawsuit. 3. With respect to Request for Production # 10 and # 11, the motion to compel be and is hereby DENIED as to the internal affairs investigation of the plaintiff, the internal affairs files of the individual defendants, and the complete personnel files of the individual defendants. 4. In all other aspects, the motion to compel be and is hereby DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 5/12/2017. (kh, )