Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-776 - Richards v. Judah (INMATE 1)


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-776 - Richards v. Judah (INMATE 1)
September 26, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: (1) plf's claim against Valerie D. Judah filed under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (2) Plf's pendent state law claim of legal malpractice be dismissed without prejudice as this court deems it inappropriate to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over this claim; (3) this case be summarily dismissed; Objections to R&R due by 10/10/2016. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 9/26/16. (djy, )
October 25, 2016
PDF | More
U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); and 4. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c), the court declines to exercise jurisdiction over Plaintiffs pendent state law claim for legal malpractice. Therefore, the legal malpractice claim is DISMISSED without prejudice. Final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/25/2016. (dmn, )ORDER: It is ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs objections (Doc. 5) are OVERRULED;2. The Recommendation (Doc. 4) is ADOPTED; 3. Plaintiffs claim against Valerie D. Judah filed under 42 U.S.C. 1983 is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28