Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-376 - Fergerson v. United States of America (INMATE 3)


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-376 - Fergerson v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
August 11, 2015
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed by Fergerson be DENIED with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 8/25/2015. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/11/2015. (kh, )
September 22, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER as follows: 1. Petitioner's 30 Objection is OVERRULED. 2. The court ADOPTS the 25 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 3. This 1 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/22/2015. (dmn, )
September 22, 2015
PDF | More
FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Respondent, United States of America, and against the Petitioner, Tracey Fergerson, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/22/2015. (Attachments: # (1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
March 20, 2017
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that Fergerson's motion (Doc. No. 47) be dismissed, because the motion constitutes a successive motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255 and Fergerson has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider a successive § 2255 motion. Objections to R&R due by 4/3/2017. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/20/2017. (dmn, )
May 4, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER as follows: 1. The Plaintiffs 49 Objection is OVERRULED. 2. The court ADOPTS the 48 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 3. The case is DISMISSED because the motion constitutes a successive motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255 and Fergerson has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider the successive 2255 motion. A Judgment will be entered in accordance with this Order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 5/4/2017. (dmn, )
May 4, 2017
PDF | More
FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Order of the court entered on this date adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiff, and this case is DISMISSED.The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a Final Judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 5/4/2017. (Attachments: # (1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )