Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-768 - Owens v. Dillard et al (INMATE 2)


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-768 - Owens v. Dillard et al (INMATE 2)
December 3, 2013
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that: 1) Plf's claims against the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 2) The Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles be DISMISSED as a party to this cause of action; 3) Plf's claims for monetary damages against Dfts be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii); and 4) This case, with respect to Plf's remaining claims be referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings; Objections to R&R due by 12/17/2013. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 12/3/2013. (wcl, )
December 3, 2013
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that Plf's 1 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction be DENIED; further the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that this case be referred back to the undersigned for additional proceedings; Objections to R&R due by 12/17/2013. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 12/3/2013. (wcl, )
December 19, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER that the court has determined the 9 Objections to be without merit, and they are hereby OVERRULED; The court ADOPTS both 7 & 8 Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) Plf's 1 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, included on page 9 of his Complaint, is DENIED; 2) Plf's claims against Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 USC § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i); 3) The Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles is DISMISSED as a party to this cause of action; 4) Plf's claims for monetary damages against Dfs are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii); 5) With respect to Plf's remaining claims, which include his request for a permanent injunction, and his claims against the individual Parole Board members other than his claim for monetary damages against them, this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 12/19/2013. (Attachments: # (1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )
December 14, 2016
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that: 1. Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Doc. 21) be GRANTED. 2. Judgment be GRANTED in favor of Defendants. 3. This case be DISMISSED with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 12/28/2016. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 12/14/2016. (kh, )
February 16, 2017
PDF | More
ants. (4) This case is Dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/16/2017. (kh, )ORDERED as follows: (1) The Plaintiff's Objections are Overruled. (2) The court adopts the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (3) Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment are Granted and judgment will be entered in favor of the defend