Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-884 - Carey v. Jones, et al. (INMATE 1)


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-884 - Carey v. Jones, et al. (INMATE 1)
April 1, 2014
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that: (1) The motion for preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff be DENIED; (2) This case be referred back the undersigned for additional proceedings; further ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to the said Recommendation on or before April 15, 2014. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on April 1, 2014. (scn, )
April 23, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER directing that, after a review of the 29 Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted; accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED; the motion for preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff is DENIED; and this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/23/14. (scn, )
April 30, 2014
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that: (1) The motion for preliminary injunction filed by the plaintiff on April 11, 2014 (Doc. No. 31) be DENIED; (2) This case be referred back to the undersigned for additional proceedings; further ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to file any objections to the said Recommendation on or before May 14, 2014. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 4/30/14. (scn, )
May 28, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER directing that the 38 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, that Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. # 31) is DENIED, and that this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/28/14. (scn, )
January 3, 2017
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1. The defendants' motion for summary judgment be GRANTED. 2. Judgment be GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 3. This case be dismissed with prejudice. 4. The costs of this proceeding be taxed against the plaintiff. Objections to R&R due by 1/17/2017. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 1/3/2017. (kh, )
February 8, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER that the 66 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The dfts' 23 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 2) Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the dfts; 3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; 4) Costs are taxed against the plf; 5) Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/8/2017. (wcl, )