Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-616 - Childrey v. CGI Technologies and Solutions et al(JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)(DISCOVERY)


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-616 - Childrey v. CGI Technologies and Solutions et al(JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)(DISCOVERY)
August 5, 2014
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION and ORDER OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that this court's August 1, 2014 Order (Doc. 28) to show cause why the motion to dismiss the amended complaint (Doc. 27) should not be granted be and is hereby VACATED; further, it is the RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (1) That the motion to dismiss the amended complaint (Doc. 27) filed by the individual defendants be GRANTED; (2) that Defendants Willie McCall, Calvin Patterson, Lynn Engram, Erin Reeves (who was incorrectly named in the amended complaint as "Erin DeBruyne"), Robert Patterson, Benjamin McCall, Kay Reader, Quinton McCall, and Tina Paulk be DISMISSED from this action; and (3) That the motion to dismiss the original complaint (Doc. 21) filed by the individual defendants be DENIED as MOOT; further ORDERED that the parties shall file any objections to the said Recommendation on or before August 19, 2014. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/5/14. (scn, )
August 28, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER: After an independent and de novo review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The 33 Recommendation of the magistrate judge, to which no objection has been filed, is adopted. (2) The 27 Motion to Dismiss the amended complaint is granted. (3) Defendants Willie McCall, Calvin Patterson, Lynn Engram, Erin Reeves (who was incorrectly named in the amended complaint as Erin DeBruyne), Robert Patterson, Benjamin McCall, Kay Reader, Quinton McCall, and Tina Paulk are dismissed and terminated as parties. (4) The motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 21) is denied as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/28/2014. (dmn, )
December 1, 2014
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that 1. that the 51 MOTION to Dismiss Count III of the Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendant CGI Technologies, Inc. be granted; 2. that Count III of the second amended complaint be dismissed; 3. that, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), Count IV and Count V of the second amended complaint be dismissed without prejudice and that Defendant McCall be dismissed from this action; and 4. that Defendant Willie McCall's 52 MOTION to Dismiss be denied as moot. Objections to R&R due by 12/15/2014. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 12/1/2014. (dmn, )
January 12, 2015
PDF | More
JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The 68 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, to which no objection has been made, is adopted. (2) Defendant CGI Technologies and Solutions' motion to dismiss Count III of the second amended complaint (doc. no. 51) is granted. (3) Count III of the second amended complaint is dismissed. (4) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), Counts IV and V of the second amended complaint are dismissed without prejudice. (5) Defendant Willie McCall is dismissed andterminated as a party. (6) Defendant McCalls motion to dismiss (doc. no.52) is denied as moot. (7) This case is referred back to the magistratejudge for further appropriate proceedings. It is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/12/2015. (Attachments: # (1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, ) Modified on 1/12/2015 (dmn, ).
March 7, 2016
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that the defendant's 90 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and that this case be dismissed with prejudice with costs taxed against the plaintiff. Objections to R&R due by 3/21/2016. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/7/2016. (dmn, )
September 29, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: After an independent and de novo review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's objections (doc. no. 115) are overruled. (2) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 112) is adopted. (3) Defendant's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 90) is granted. Judgment is entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff in all respects except for the claim described below. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/29/2017. (kh, )
January 9, 2018
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that the defendant's motion for summary judgment on Childrey's retaliation claim be granted and that this case be dismissed with prejudice with costs taxed against the plaintiff. Objections to R&R due by 1/23/2018. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 1/9/2018. (kh, )
March 28, 2018
PDF | More
OPINION: Upon an independent and de novo review of the recordin this case, the court concludes that the magistrate judges recommendation should be adopted. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/28/2018. (dmn, )
March 28, 2018
PDF | More
JUDGMENT: In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The magistrate judges recommendation (doc. no. 126) is accepted, although the court does not adopt the reasoning fully. (2) Defendant CGI Technologies and Solutionsmotion for summary judgment on the plaintiff Zeffie Childreys remaining retaliation claim (doc. no. 120) is granted. (3) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant CGI Technologies and Solutions and against plaintiffChildrey, with plaintiff Childrey taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Childrey, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter thisdocument on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/28/2018. (Attachments: # (1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )