Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-787 - Posey v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama et al (MAG2)


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-787 - Posey v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama et al (MAG2)
March 11, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint Narrowing the Scope of this Action (Doc. 33) is GRANTED, and that Plaintiff shall file his Amended Complaint on or before March 18, 2016. Further, the undersigned Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS as follows: a. that, because Plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed all of his claims against The Hartford pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), The Hartford's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17) be DENIED as moot; b. that, upon the filing of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, Hyundai's Preliminary Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Class Allegations (Doc. 21) and Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 20) be DENIED as moot; c. that those claims against Defendant Hyundai omitted from the amended complaint, including Plaintiff's class claims under the FMLA, ADA, and state law, and Plaintiff's individual claims under the FMLA and state law, be DISMISSED without prejudice; and d. that this matter be referred back to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 3/25/2016. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 3/11/2016. (kh, )
April 4, 2016
PDF | More
ORDERED that (1) The 36 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) Defendant The Hartford's 17 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot because Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed all of his claims against The Hartford pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i); (3) Defendant Hartford is DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause of action based on Plaintiff's 31 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal; (4) Defendant Hyundai's Preliminary 21 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Class Allegations and 20 Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings are DENIED as moot; (5) The claims against Defendant Hyundai omitted from the amended complaint, including Plaintiff's class claims under the FMLA, ADA, and state law and Plaintiff's individual claims under the FMLA and state law are DISMISSED without prejudice; and (6) This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/4/2016. (kh, )
January 24, 2017
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Dft's 40 Renewed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Judgment on the pleadings should be granted in favor of Dft, and against Plf, with respect to Plf's ADA failure to accommodate claims; With respect to Plf's ADA intentional discrimination claim, judgment on the pleadings should be denied; further RECOMMENDED that this case be referred back to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings; Objections to R&R due by 2/7/2017. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 1/24/2017. (wcl, )
March 22, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that Plf's and Dft's 47 & 48 objections are OVERRULED; the Magistrate Judge's 46 Recommendation is ADOPTED; and Dft's 40 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, consistent with this opinion. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/22/2017. (Attachments: # (1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )