Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-442 - Parker v. Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-442 - Parker v. Judicial Inquiry Commission of the State of Alabama et al
September 29, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that Dfts' 12 and 13 motions to dismiss are GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/29/2016. (wcl, )
August 31, 2017
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) Dfts' 51 & 53 Motions to Dismiss are DENIED as to all of Justice Parker's claims, except those brought pursuant to the Due Process Clause; 2) Dfts' 51 & 53 Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED in part, only as to Justice Parker's due process claims; and 3) Justice Parker's due process claims are DISMISSED with prejudice; further ORDERED that Dfts shall file an answer to the Complaint on or before 9/14/2017. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/31/2017. (Attachments: # (1) Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
December 14, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: Dfts' 77 objection to discovery is OVERRULED, and Justice Parker's 77 motion for discovery is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as further set out in order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 12/14/2017. (alm, )
March 2, 2018
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that Justice Parker's 82 Motion for a Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, that the JIC's 92 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED, and that the JIC's 92 request for an immediate trial on the merits (Doc. # 92, at ii n.2) is construed as a motion and DENIED; further ORDERED that Dfts are ENJOINED from enforcing Alabama Canon of Judicial Ethics 3A(6) to the extent that it proscribes public comment by a judge about a pending or impending proceeding in a court outside the state of Alabama, and Dfts are ENJOINED from enforcing the Canon to the extent that it proscribes public comment by a judge that cannot reasonably be expected to affect the outcome or impair the fairness of a proceeding in Alabama. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/2/2018. (alm, )