Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-942 - Williams v. Whiteside (INMATE 2)


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-942 - Williams v. Whiteside (INMATE 2)
May 18, 2017
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: 1) Dft Crow's 15 & 17 motion for summary judgment be GRANTED; 2) The medical dfts' (Timothy Whiteside, Tara Parker, Darryl Ellis, and Justin Oden) 14 motion to dismiss be GRANTED to the extent these dfts seek dismissal of this case due to Plf's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy prior to filing this case; 3) This case be DISMISSED without prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 USC 1997e(a) for Plf's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy before seeking relief from this court; 4) No costs be taxed; Objections to R&R due by 6/5/2017. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 5/18/2017. (wcl, )
June 15, 2017
PDF | More
ORDERED as follows: 1) The 19 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) Dft John Crow's 15 & 17 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 3) The 14 motion to dismiss filed by Dfts Whiteside, Parker, Ellis, and Oden is GRANTED for Plf's failure to properly exhaust his administrative remedies; 4) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice under 42 USC 1997e(a) for Plf's failure to properly exhaust his administrative remedies; and 5) No costs are taxed. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/15/2017. (wcl, )