Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-973 - Hampton v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 1)


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-973 - Hampton v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 1)
April 6, 2017
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that: 1. Officers Johnson and Joushua be dismissed as defendants in this cause of action because the record demonstrates that these individuals were not members of the Certified Emergency Response Team who entered Draper on 12/13/2016. 2. This case be referred back to the undersigned for additional proceedings against defendants Baldwin, Ellington, Williams, Copeland and Melton. Objections to R&R due by 4/19/2017. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 4/5/2017. (dmn, )
April 24, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: On 4/6/2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a 53 Recommendation. Plaintiff timely filed an 54 Objection, but the objection does not challenge the Magistrate Judges Recommendation that Officers Johnson and Joushua be dismissed on grounds that there is no record that officers by these names participated in the shakedown at Draper Correctional Facility. Rather, Plaintiff contends that he has been unable to ascertain the identities of the additional officers who participated in the shakedown. An objection is not the proper place to raise this argument. Based upon an independent and de novo review, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiffs objection (Doc. 54) is OVERRULED; (2) The Magistrate Judges Recommendation (Doc. 53) is ADOPTED; (3) Plaintiffs claims against Officers Johnson and Joushua are dismissed, and the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate these officers as Defendants; and (4) This action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings against Defendants Baldwin, Ellington, Williams, Copeland, and Melton. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/24/2017. (Attachments: # (1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
April 6, 2018
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that: 1. The plaintiff's 117 Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED. 2. The plaintiff's claims against Terry Edwards be DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. Terry Edwards be DISMISSED as a party to this cause of action. 4. This case be referred back to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for further appropriate proceedings against the remaining defendants. Objections to R&R due by 4/20/2018. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 4/6/2018. (dmn, )
April 26, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER: Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 118.) No party filed an objection to the Recommendation. Based upon an independent review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The Recommendation (Doc. 118) is ADOPTED; (2) Plaintiffs motion to dismiss (Doc. 117) is GRANTED; (3) Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Terry Edwards are DISMISSED without prejudice; (4) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to reflect in the courts electronic record that, as of todays date, Terry Edwards is terminated as a party to this action; and (5) This action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further appropriate proceedings against the remaining Defendants. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/26/2018. (dmn, )