Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-064 - Crosby v. Oates et al (INMATE 1)


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-064 - Crosby v. Oates et al (INMATE 1)
March 21, 2017
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: 1) The 6 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by William L. Crosby be DENIED; 2) The plf's 1 motion for preliminary injunction be DENIED as the plf has failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits of his claims; 3) This case be dismissed without prejudice for the plf's failure to pay the full filing and administrative fees upon the initiation of this case; Objections to R&R due by 4/4/2017. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 3/21/2017. (wcl, )
April 28, 2017
PDF | More
ORDERED as follows: 1) The 13 Objection is OVERRULED; 2) The court adopts the 12 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; 3) The Plf's 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED; 4) The Plf's 1 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED; 5) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plf's failure to pay the full filing and administrative fees upon the initiation of this case. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/28/2017. (wcl, )
April 28, 2017
PDF | More
FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Dfts and against William L. Crosby. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/28/2017. (Attachments: # (1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )