Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-084 - Ellis v. Rahming (INMATE 2)


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-084 - Ellis v. Rahming (INMATE 2)
July 13, 2017
PDF | More
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: 1) Dft Rahming's 10 motion to dismiss be GRANTED to the extent Dft seeks dismissal of this case due to Plf's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy prior to filing this case; 2) This case be DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 USC 1997e(a) for Plf's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy before seeking relief from this court; 3) No costs be taxed; Objections to R&R due by 7/27/2017. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 7/13/2017. (wcl, )
August 4, 2017
PDF | More
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 14 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and this case be and is hereby DISMISSED as follows: 1) Dft Rahming's 10 motion to dismiss is GRANTED to the extent Dft seeks dismissal of this case due to Plf's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy prior to filing this case; 2) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 USC 1997e(a) for Plf's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy before seeking relief from this court; 3) No costs are taxed. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/4/2017. (wcl, )