Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-225 - Hughes v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (MAG2)


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-225 - Hughes v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (MAG2)
May 3, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER re 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Tiffany Hughes. The Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to send to Plaintiff the long affidavit form. Further, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff file this Affidavit on or before 5/10/2017. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 5/3/2017. Copy with long IFP form mailed to Plaintiff as directed.(dmn, )
February 22, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER GRANTING 36 MOTION for leave; directing that on or before 3/9/2018, def shall file a reply to plfs' response to its motion to dismiss. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 2/22/18. (djy, )
May 7, 2018
PDF | More
AMENDED UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER GRANTING 45 Joint MOTION for Extension of deadlines as follows: Section 2: Dispositive Motions 9/18/2018;Section 3: The Parties Settlement Conference 10/9/2018;Section 7: Discovery Cutoff 9/14/2018; advising the parties that the extensions may necessitate the entry of a new scheduling order at a later date depending on the Court's schedule. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 5/7/18. (djy, )
June 12, 2018
PDF | More
)REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that Dfts' 32 & 42 Motions to Dismiss be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1) Dfts' Motions to Dismiss be denied as to Plf's claim for Defamation; 2) Dfts' Motions to Dismiss be granted as to Plf's claim for Invasion of Privacy based upon publicity, but be denied as to Plf's claim for Invasion of Privacy based upon intrusion upon seclusion; 3) Dfts' Motions to Dismiss be granted as to Plf's claims for Tortious Conduct and Conspiracy; 4) All other pending motions shall be denied as Moot; Objections to R&R due by 6/26/2018. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 6/12/2018. (wcl,
June 29, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to why 48 Motion to Compel should not be granted; Show Cause Response due by 7/13/2018. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 6/29/18. (djy, )
July 9, 2018
PDF | More
etermination or recommendation as may be appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/9/18. (Attachments: # (1) civil appeals checklist)(djy, )ORDER ADOPTING in part and MODIFYING in part the 47 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; ORDERING as follows: (1) defs' 32 & 42 Motions to Dismiss are DENIED as to plf's claim for defamation; (2) def's 32 & 42 Motions to dismiss are GRANTED as to plf's claim for invasion of privacy based upon publicity, but DENIED as to plf's claim for invasion of privacy based upon intrusion upon seclusion; (3) def's 32 & 42 Motions to dismiss are GRANTED as to plf's claims for tortious conduct and conspiracy; (4) plf's 40 motion for oral argument is DENIED as moot; and (5) This action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 for further proceedings and d
September 4, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to why 63 Motion to Compel should not be granted; Show Cause Response due by 9/14/2018. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 9/4/18. (djy, )
October 15, 2018
PDF | More
again REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 636 for further proceedings, determinations, and recommendations as may be appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/15/18. (djy, )MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that: (1) Wal-Mart's 58 objections are OVERRULED; (2) the 48 motion to compel is GRANTED; (3) The orders of the Magistrate Judge (Docs. # 56, 57) are ADOPTED, except that the deadlines for a joint protective order and for production are modified below; (4) on or before 10/26/2018, plf and def Wal-Mart shall file a joint motion for a protective order that will govern production of customer-patient information; (5) on or before 11/2/2018 Defendant Wal-Mart shall produce to Plaintiff the names of any people including Wal-Mart's customerpatients who were at the pharmacy counter on 7/6/2016, when the discussion between Plaintiff and Defendant Hughes occurred; and (6) This case is