Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

03-275 - Champion, et al v. Homa, et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
03-275 - Champion, et al v. Homa, et al
March 10, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why the plfs claims against Richard Homa and Michael Gause should not be dismissed for want of prosecution; Show Cause Response due by 3/17/2008. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/10/08. (djy, )
March 12, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER allowing the plfs one more chance to address the Courts concerns and show the factual and legal grounds that would prevent this Court from dismissing this action against Richard Homa and Michael Gause either for want of prosecution or for want of timely service by no later than 3/17/2008, as further set out in order. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/12/08. (djy, )
March 20, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER that all claims against Gause are dismissed without prejudice.. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/20/08. (Attachments: # (1) appeals checklist)(vma, )
March 31, 2008
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as follows: 1) granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Defendants Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. and Fay Matsukage as set forth in this Memorandum Opinion and Order; 2) All claims by the Investor Plaintiffs gainst Defendants Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. and Fay Matsukage pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Third Claim for Relief and part of the Fifteenth Claim for Relief) are dismissed with prejudice because they are barred by the statute of repose; 3) All claims of all Plaintiff against Defendants Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. and Fay Matsukage pursuant to 28 USC 1962 (First and Second Claim for Relief) are dismissed with prejudice because they are legally barred; 4) All other claims against Defendants Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. and Fay Matsukage are dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction and Defendants Dill, Dill Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. and Fay Matsukage are dismissed as a defendants to this action. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/31/08. (Attachments: # (1) appeals checklist)(vma, )
April 10, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER granting 61 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Defendant Richard Homa. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 4/10/08. (Attachments: # (1) appeals checklist) (vma, )
April 10, 2008
PDF | More
FINAL JUDGMENT it is Ordered and Adjudged that as follows: 1) Judgment is entered in favor of Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker, and Hutchings, P.C., and Fay Matsukage and against the Plaintiffs; 2) All claims againt Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. and Fay Matsukage are dismissed with prejudice; 3) The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiffs'; 4) The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP and close this file. Signed by Judge Mark E. Fuller on 4/10/08. (Attachments: # (1) appeals checklist)(vma, )