Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-1029 - Pressley v. City of Anniston Alabama et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-1029 - Pressley v. City of Anniston Alabama et al
September 7, 2016
PDF | More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER FINDING AS MOOT 52 MOTION to Strike Portions of Declaration of Jennifer Pressley, GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment, GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 26 PARTIAL MOTION for Summary Judgment as set out herein. All paramour favoritism and all disparate treatment in job assignment claims are HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Further, the following Counts are HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: Count I, Count II, Count VIII (against the City), Count VIII (against Mr. Abernathy for gender-discrimination with retaliation remaining for trial), Count X, and Count XI. The Counts remaining in the action are Counts III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII (claim for retaliation against Mr. Abernathy only), and IX. By separate order, the Court will set this case for a pretrial conference. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 9/7/2016. (JLC)