Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

06-785 - Baucom v. Sisco Stevedoring, LLC et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
06-785 - Baucom v. Sisco Stevedoring, LLC et al
June 15, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER denying 36Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment as to defendants Pinnacle and Sisco; GRANTING 53Siscos Motion to File Response to Plaintiffs Reply Memorandum & GRANTING 54 Kinders Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply Memorandum all as set out. Signed by Judge William H. Steele on 6/14/07. Copies to parties. (mpp)
February 1, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER stating the Court concludes that the facts and law admit of onlyone reasonable conclusion as to whether the SISCO I is a vessel for Jones Act purposes and whether Baucom is a seaman for Jones Act purposes with respect to his claims against Pinnacle/Sisco. Plaintiff's request for sanctions, including attorneys fees and costs incurred in connection with the trial briefing process, is DENIED. Signed by Judge William H. Steele on 2/1/08. Copies to parties. (mpp)
May 5, 2008
PDF | More
Order finding in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, Sisco Stevedoring & Pinnacle Management on the claim of Jones Act Negligence; finding in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant Sisco Stevedoring on the claim of unseaworthiness; finding in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff on the claim for exemplary damages & attorney's fees relating to defendants' allegedly bad-faith denial of maintenance & cure benefits. Judgment will be entered against both defendants, jointly & severally, on the Jones Act negligence claim in the amount of $287,384.09 (as set out). Signed by Judge William H. Steele on 5/5/08. (tgw)
June 12, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER denying 150 Motion for New Trial or in the Alternative to Alter or Amend Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; denying 151 Motion for Oral Argument; denying 154 Motion for Guidance with Respect to Satisfying the May 5, 2008 Order ; granting 156 Motion for Leave to File Reply. Signed by Judge William H. Steele on 6/12/08. (tgw)