Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

11-1143 - Seaton v. Astrue


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
11-1143 - Seaton v. Astrue
March 22, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER GRANTING defendant's motion to remand (doc. 22). Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Commissioner and remand for further proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the ALJ is directed to:(1) reevaluate the medical source opinions of record in determining plaintiff's RFC pursuant to the standards for weighing medical opinions listed in 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(d); (2) reevaluate the plaintiff's subjective symptoms in determining plaintiff's RFC; (3) obtain vocational expert testimony to determine the effect of plaintiff's specific functional limitations on his ability to perform work, if plaintiff's exertional capacity does not coincidewith an exertional level; (4) undertake a new step five analysis to determine whether there are jobs existing in significant numbers that plaintiff can perform given his age, education, work experience, and RFC. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 3/22/2012.(KMG)
June 30, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER granting 34 Plaintiff's Attorney's Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees in the amount of $31,574.79. Defendant shall refund to plaintiff the remainder, if any, of any past due benefits withheld for potential attorney's fees. See order for additional details. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 6/29/2016.(LMR)