Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-747 - Jordan v. Ryan et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-747 - Jordan v. Ryan et al
June 17, 2015
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, recommending that the Current Habeas Petition (Doc. 5) be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be denied because dismissal of the Current Habeas Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 06/17/2015. (ATD)
September 1, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) is accepted and adopted. Petitioner's objections (Doc. 23) are overruled. The Petition (as amended) is denied and dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability because dismissal of the petition is based on a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find this Court's procedural ruling debatable, and Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/1/2015. (ACL)
July 8, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER that the motion to reopen case and motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 27) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to amend the motion to reopen (Doc. 28) is granted to the extent that the Court permits amendment to add the request for a certificate of appealability, but the request for a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 7/8/16.(KGM)
March 5, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to reopen this case (Doc. 33) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent Doc. 33 could be considered a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60, rather than a motion for reconsideration, a certificate of appealability is denied as to this Order [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/5/18. (MAW)