Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-585 - Mims v. United States of America

Download Files


Document in Context
16-585 - Mims v. United States of America
October 28, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER denying 10 Motion to Intervene without prejudice. The Government shall review all of the property in question and determine the nature of the data contained therein; no later than thirty days from the date of this Order, the Government shall report to Movants regarding whether the property contains sensitive or personal information. If the Government's report reveals any relevant data concerning Movants, Movants may renew this Motion to Intervene within ten days of the date of the report. FURTHER ORDERED that, if the Government's report does not reveal that the property contains any relevant data concerning Movants, the Government shall, within thirty days of its report, notify the Court that Plaintiff's property at issue has been returned to her or describing its efforts to return Plaintiff's property and the expected date on which it will be returned. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 10/28/16. (ATD)
February 9, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint 1 as moot and terminate this action. This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4 (a) (1) should not be filed until entry of the District Court's judgment. The parties shall have fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. Thereafter, the parties have fourteen days within which to file a response to the objections. Failure to file timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation may result in the acceptance of the Report and Recommendation by the District Court without further review. Failure to file timely objections to any factual determinations of the Magistrate Judge may be considered a waiver of a party's right to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or judgment entered pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bridget S Bade on 2/09/2017. (REK)
April 14, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING AND THE ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 30 - This case is dismissed, as moot, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment of dismissal accordingly. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/13/17. (SLQ)