Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-2143 - Alonso v. Ryan et al

Download Files


Document in Context
16-2143 - Alonso v. Ryan et al
July 24, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, recommending that Petitioner's 10 Motion for Clarification or in the Alternative for Stay in Abeyance be DENIED. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 7/24/2017. (ATD)
August 15, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 85) is accepted to the limited extent that the motion for clarification or for stay in abeyance (Doc. 10) is denied. Petitioner's factual objections found in Doc. 86 are deemed moot, without prejudice to Petitioner reasserting them, if relevant, should he object to the Report and Recommendation filed on August 10, 2017 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 8/15/17. (MAW)
March 8, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 87 is accepted. The objections 98 are overruled. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment denying and dismissing the Amended Petition, with prejudice. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability because dismissal of portions of the petition is based on a plain procedural bar and jurists would not find this Court's procedural ruling debatable, and Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/08/2018. (REK)