Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-2801 - Brown et al v. Sperber-Porter et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-2801 - Brown et al v. Sperber-Porter et al
March 30, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED that the hearing set for April 4, 2018 at 10:30 am before Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade is VACATED. The April 2, 2018 deadline for the parties to file witness lists and a joint exhibit list is VACATED. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Petitioners' petitions for charging orders (Docs. 169, 170, and 171) be GRANTED and that the Court enter charging orders against Eva Sperber-Porter's interests in Baseline, Litchfield, and TDI, as set forth in Attachments A,B, and C. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Petitioners' withdrawn petitions for charging orders (Docs. 172, 173, and 174) be DENIED as moot. This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The parties shall have fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The parties have fourteen days within which to file a response to the objections. Failure to file timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation may result in the acceptance of the Report and Recommendation by the District Court without further review. Failure to file timely objections to any factual determinations of the Magistrate Judge may be considered a waiver of a party's right to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or judgment entered pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bridget S Bade on 3/29/2018. (REK)
April 30, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 244 is adopted as the Order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will enter by separate order the charging orders against Eva Sperber-Porter's interests in Baseline, Litchfield, and TDO, as set forth in Attachments A, B, and C. (Doc. 169, 170, and 171) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Petitioner's remaining petitions for charging orders. (Doc. 172, 173, and 174) Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 4/30/2018. (REK)