Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-3156 - Horton v. Jacobs et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-3156 - Horton v. Jacobs et al
February 26, 2018
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Petition (Doc. 1) be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be denied because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar. The parties shall have fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. Thereafter, the parties have fourteen days within which to file a response to the objections. Failure to file timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation may result in the acceptance of the Report and Recommendation by the District Court without further review. Failure to file timely objections to any factual determinations of the Magistrate Judge may be considered a waiver of a party's right to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order or judgment entered pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 2/23/2018. (REK)
April 3, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because dismissal of the petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find the ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 4/3/18. (EJA)