Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-3902 - Thompson v. Arpaio


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-3902 - Thompson v. Arpaio
November 3, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 31 Second Amended Complaint: IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Court order Maricopa County to answer Count One of the Second Amended Complaint. FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Court order Defendant DO B2230 to answer the retaliation claim in Count Two of the Second Amended Complaint that is based on DO B2230's alleged issuance of a Disciplinary Report after Plaintiff submitted a grievance. FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Court dismiss Count Two as to Plaintiff's allegations that DO B2230 "suggested" that Plaintiff be moved to a different pod and housed with an inmate of another race. FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Court order Defendant DO B2584 to answer Count Three of the Second Amended Complaint. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 11/2/2017. (ATD)
December 4, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 32 re screening 31 Second Amended Complaint - The Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a service packet including the Second Amended Complaint, this Order, and a copy of the Marshal's Process Receipt & Return form (USM-285) and Notice of Lawsuit & Request for Waiver of Service of Summons form for Defendants Maricopa County, DO B2230, and DO B2584. Plaintiff shall complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Second Amended Complaint on Defendants within 90 days of the filing of the Second Amended Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/4/17. (LAD)
June 4, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff's "Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery" (Doc. 54). (See document for complete details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 6/1/18. (SLQ)