Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

18-121 - Padilla v. Lucero et al

Download Files


Document in Context
18-121 - Padilla v. Lucero et al
April 11, 2018
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS RECOMMENDED that Petitioner's motion for immediate release 13 and motion for stay of removal 19 be DENIED. This recommendation is not an order that is immediately appealable to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Any notice of appeal should not be filed until entry of the District Court's judgment. The parties have fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of this recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The parties have fourteen days within which to file a response to the objections. Failure to file timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation may result in the District Court's acceptance of the Report and Recommendation without further review. Failure to timely file objections to any factual determinations of the Magistrate Judge will be considered a waiver of a party's right to appellate review of the findings of fact in an order of judgment entered pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bridget S Bade on 4/11/2018. (REK)
May 9, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Petitioner's Motion for Immediate Release and Motion for Stay of Removal. (Docs. 13 and 19) Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 5/09/2018. (REK)