Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-8153 - Yazzie v. Mohave, County of et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-8153 - Yazzie v. Mohave, County of et al
October 15, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER denying as moot 50 Plaintiff's Second Motion for Extension of Time for Discovery. FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to LR Civ. 7.2(i), if Plaintiff VinaYazzie fails to timely respond to the pending motions to withdraw, this Court will deemPlaintiff's failure to respond as consent to the Court granting the motions. FURTHER ORDERED granting 58 Mr. Coronado's Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically. Mr. Coronado shall call into chambers at 602-322-7560 at the time set for the hearing. FURTHER ORDERED granting 61 Defendants' Motion for Expedited Ruling. FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Coronado shall send a copy of this Order to his client. See attached Order. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 10/15/2015.(TLB)
November 6, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER that Plaintiff's supplemental response filed at Doc. 70 is stricken. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a supplemental response that fully complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Local Rule Civil 56.1 by Tuesday, November 10, 2015. If Plaintiff fails to file a complying response within this deadline, the Court will deem all of Plaintiff's procedural objections to this Court considering the pending motion as one for judgment on the pleadings to be waived. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 11/6/2015. (KMG)
November 25, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER - ORDERED granting in part 26 Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as follows: Counts 10 and 11 against Defendant Mohave County are dismissed (The Clerk of the Court shall not enter judgment). The Motion is denied to the extent it seeks judgment on Counts 1-6 for failure to state a claim. The Motion remains under advisement regarding whether Plaintiff exhausted her disability discrimination claims with the EEOC (thus whetherCounts 1-6 will be dismissed on this basis remains under advisement). Because Counts 7-9 were not the subject of the Motion of Judgment on the Pleadings, they are not dismissed. Counts 10 and 11 against Defendants Steve Latoski, Ramon Osuna, Kevin Stockbridge, and Warren Twitchel are also not dismissed. FURTHER ORDERED denying 43 Plaintiff's Second Motion for Extension of Time to Amend Pleading. FINALLY ORDERED that Defendants shall reply to Plaintiff's Rule 56 response by 12/14/2015. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 11/25/15.(TLB)
December 21, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER that the motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. 26), which was converted to a motion for summary judgment (Doc. 68) is granted as to Count 1-6 (which were still under advisement following the Order at Doc. 74). Because various counts remain in this case, the Clerk of the Court shall not enter judgment at this time. See order for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 12/21/15. (NKS)
July 19, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts 7-11 of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, (Doc. 83), is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on all counts of the First Amended Complaint, (Doc. 4), see also (Docs. 74, 82), and shall terminate this case. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 7/19/2016.(KMG)