Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-8274 - Sunburst Minerals LLC v. Emerald Copper Corporation et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-8274 - Sunburst Minerals LLC v. Emerald Copper Corporation et al
September 25, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 52 Motion for Summary Judgment. Sunburst is entitled to judgment in its favor as to both counts of its complaint and both counts of Emerald's counter-complaint with regard to Copper Hill Mill Site NSedwick on 9/25/17.(JWS)os. 18, 1012; Hermes Mill Site No. 13; Copper Hill Mill No. 1 Mill Site Nos. 1415; Copper Hill No. 2; Hermes; Hermes No. 2; Jimtown Copper No. 1; Valley Copper Nos. 13; and FDR. In all other respects the motion is denied. Signed by Judge John W
October 25, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER granting 113 Motion for clarification of the courts order and opinion at docket 112. See PDF document. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 10/25/17. (JWS)
January 11, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER AND OPINION - The motions at dockets 116 and 123 are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: Sunburst's Block Claims are invalid to the extent they exceed 600 feet in width. In all other respects the motions are denied. The motion at docket 133 is DENIED. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 1/11/18. (LAD)