Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-8224 - Ramirez v. Ryan et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-8224 - Ramirez v. Ryan et al
November 30, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Amended Petition (Doc. 4) be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal be denied because the undersigned does not find that jurists of reason would find it debatable that (i) the dismissal of a majority of Petitioner's habeas claims are justified by a plain procedural bar and (ii) Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as to the remaining claims for relief. (See document for full details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 11/30/17. (SLQ)
May 7, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER AND DENIAL OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS - IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's R&R (Doc. 24) is ACCEPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying and dismissing Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 (Doc. 4) with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action. Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order denying Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED because the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find the ruling debatable, and because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 5/7/18. (SLQ)