Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

14-2025 - Joshua David Mellberg LLC et al v. Will et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
14-2025 - Joshua David Mellberg LLC et al v. Will et al
February 9, 2015
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court, after its independent review: (1) grant in part and deny in part Defendant Will and Fine's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 22). Defendants' Motion should be granted to the extent that Plaintiffs' claims of unfair competition (Third Claim) and unjust enrichment (Fifth Claim) should be dismissed with leave to amend. Defendants Motion should be denied to the extent Defendants seek dismissal of Plaintiffs' claims: under AUTSA (Second Claim); for breach of contract against Defendant Fine (Fourth Claim); for breach of fiduciary duty/duty of loyalty (Sixth Claim); civil conspiracy (Tenth Claim); and aiding and abetting (Eleventh Claim); (2) grant Defendant Impact Partnership's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 27) with leave to amend; (3) grant Defendant Godinez' Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 30) with leave to amend; (4) grant Defendant Carly Uretz' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 34) with leave to amend. If objections are filed, the parties should use the following case number: CV 14-2025-TUC-CKJ. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles R Pyle on 2/9/2015. (See Order for details) (ALS)
March 30, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Report and Recommendation 45 is ADOPTED; The pending motions (Docs. 22, 27, 30, and 34) are granted and denied as set forth in this Order. Plaintiffs may file a second amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order as set forth herein and in the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 3/27/2015. (See Order for details)(ALS)
January 22, 2016
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court deny Defendant Impact Partnership's 55 Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. Any party may serve and file written objections within 14 Days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 Days after being served with a copy. No replies to objections shall be filed unless leave is granted from the District Court to do so. If objections are filed, the parties should use the following case number: CV-14-02025-TUC-CKJ. Failure to file timely objections to any factual or legal determination of the Magistrate Judge may be deemed a waiver of the party's right to de novo review of the issues. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles R Pyle on 1/22/16.((BAC)
March 14, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 82 Report and Recommendation. Defendant Impact Partnerships 55 Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint is denied. This case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Charles R. Pyle for all pretrial proceedings and any reports and recommendations as set forth in 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1) and L.R.Civ.P. 72.1 and 72.2. All future filings in this case shall be designated: 14-CV-02025-TUC-CKJ (CRP). Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 3/11/2016. (KEP)