Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-462 - McBeath v. Tucson Tamale Company


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-462 - McBeath v. Tucson Tamale Company
January 31, 2017
PDF | More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court, after its independent review, deny Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 18); and grant Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (Doc. 25). Any party may serve and file written objections within 14 DAYS after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 DAYS after being served with a copy. No replies to objections shall be filed unless leave is granted from the District Court to do so. If objections are filed, the parties should use the following case number: CV 16-462-TUC-DCB (see attached Order for complete details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernardo P Velasco on 1/31/2017. (MFR)
February 23, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is Ordered that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29) is adopted as the opinion of the Court. It is further Ordered that the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 18) is DENIED. It is further Ordered that the Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (Doc. 25) is GRANTED. It is further Ordered that this case remains referred to Magistrate Judge Bernardo P. Velasco. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 2/21/2017. (MFR)
July 21, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order that Protects Defendants' Employees from Intimidation and Declares that Plaintiff may have Ex Parte Contact with Them (Doc. 30) is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART. It is further Ordered that Plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order to Shield Experts Consulted Informally (Doc 39) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is further Ordered Defendants' Motion to Quash and for Protective Order Protecting Third Party Koty-Leavitt Insurance Agency from Plaintiff's Subpoena (Doc. 55) is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART. It is further Ordered Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendants: (1) to give their consent to Google to produce responsive e-mails; (2) to allow Shawn Kaylor to produce responsive e-mails; (3) to destroy employment files obtained from Plaintiff's prior employer; and (4) to narrow subpoena served on Glenn Murphy (Doc. 70) is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART (see attached Order for complete details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernardo P Velasco on 7/20/2017.(MFR)