| |
16-1095 - Smith, et al v. Hickenlooper
Download Files
Descriptive Metadata
| MODS |
Authenticity Metadata
| PREMIS |
All Format & Metadata Files
| ZIP file |
Metadata
Category | Judicial Publications |
Collection | United States Courts Opinions |
SuDoc Class Number | JU 2.11 |
Court Type | Appellate |
Court Name | United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit |
Circuit | 10th |
Nature of Suit | Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Party Names | Douglas A. Berman, Amicus Curiae Sam Kamin, Amicus Curiae Alex Kreit, Amicus Curiae Robert A. Mikos, Amicus Curiae State of Oregon, Amicus Curiae State of Washington, Amicus Curiae Robert J. Watkins, Amicus Curiae Ronald B. Bruce, Appellant Chad Day, Appellant Scott DeCoste, Appellant Shayne Heap, Appellant John D. Jenson, Appellant Frederick D. McKee, Appellant Charles F. Moser, Appellant Mark L. Overman, Appellant Burton Pianalto, Appellant Paul B. Schaub, Appellant Casey Sheridan, Appellant Justin E. Smith, Appellant John W. Hickenlooper, Appellee
|
Document in Context
16-1095 - Smith, et al v. Hickenlooper |
|
June 7, 2017
|
|
[10472821] No 16-1048 is Affirmed, 16-1095 is Affirmed and 16-1266 is Affirmed in Part and Reversed in Part and Remanded; Terminated on the merits after oral hearing;Written, signed, published; Judges Briscoe, authoring, Hartz, concurring and Holmes. Mandate to issue. [16-1048, 16-1095, 16-1266]
| |
|