Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

13-2019 - USA v. Darrell Jones

Download Files


Document in Context
13-2019 - USA v. Darrell Jones
February 7, 2014
PDF | More
Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. Jones's submissions on appeal are construed as an implicit request for permission to proceed, see Melton v. United States, 359 F.3d 855, 858 (7th Cir. 2004), but after reviewing the district court's decision and the record, the court concludes that Jones has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, his application for a certificate of appealability is DENIED. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); United States v. Carraway, 479 F.3d 845, 849 (7th Cir. 2007). Jones is warned that if he continues to file successive collateral attacks on his convictions without the court's authorization, he is likely to face monetary sanctions and a restriction on future filings. See Montgomery v. Davis, 362 F.3d 956, 957-58 (7th Cir. 2004); Alexander v. United States, 121 F.3d 312, 316 (7th Cir. 1997). Diane P. Wood, Chief Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and John Daniel Tinder, Circuit Judge. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 70123460000091728695.[6550960-1] [6550960] [13-2019]