Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

15-3575 - USA v. Thomas Cureton


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
15-3575 - USA v. Thomas Cureton
January 5, 2017
PDF | More
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Hamilton. AFFIRMED. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6809219-1] [6809219] [15-3575, 15-3581]
February 16, 2018
PDF | More
Filed opinion of the court PER CURIAM. Under these circumstances, a limited Paladino remand should suffice. We order a LIMITED REMAND so that the district court can determine whether it would have imposed the same sentence on Cureton, knowing that in light of Dean, it may consider the mandatory sentence under § 924(c) when deciding the sentences for other crimes, or whether the court wishes to have a new opportunity to exercise its discretion and judgment in a complete resentencing. We shall retain jurisdiction over these appeals pending the district court’s response. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6904276-1] [6904276] [15-3575, 15-3581]
April 10, 2018
PDF | More
Filed opinion of the court PER CURIAM. The district court has complied with the terms of our limited remand. We see no need for further proceedings in this case on the subject of Dean. The judgments of the district court, including the 444-month total term of imprisonment, are AFFIRMED. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6916712-1] [6916712] [15-3575, 15-3581]