Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-2391 - USA v. Charles Colson

Download Files


Document in Context
16-2391 - USA v. Charles Colson
January 12, 2017
PDF | More
Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. We thus VACATE the court’s order and REMAND for the court to take a fresh look at Colson’s motion. On remand the court also should take note of Colson’s projected release date in 2021 and, in its discretion, may elect to deny his motion without prejudice or defer ruling until a date closer to the commencement of his term of supervised release. See United States v. Williams, 840 F.3d 865, 865 (7th Cir. 2016) (upholding district court’s determination that motion to modify conditions of supervised release made 14 years before defendant’s projected release was premature); United States v. Siegel, 753 F.3d 705, 716–17 (7th Cir. 2014) (noting that “best practices” include considering modifications on the “eve” of defendant’s release). Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge and David F. Hamilton, Circuit Judge. [6811190-1] [6811190] [16-2391]