Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

11-16438 - USA v. Sundeep Dharni


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
11-16438 - USA v. Sundeep Dharni
January 3, 2014
PDF | More
FILED OPINION (J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, RAYMOND C. FISHER and MARSHA S. BERZON) AFFIRMED. Judge: JCW Authoring, Judge: RCF , Judge: MSB . FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [8923779]
July 2, 2014
PDF | More
Filed Order for PUBLICATION (J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, RAYMOND C. FISHER and MARSHA S. BERZON) (JCW Dissenting) Appellant Sundeep Dharni???s petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The previous opinion, United States v. Dharni, 738 F.3d 1186 (9th Cir. 2014), is VACATED. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED AS MOOT. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) We VACATE submission of this case, and retain jurisdiction over this appeal pending the district court???s disposition of this limited remand. The parties shall notify the court within seven days of entry of the district court???s order. We shall determine at that time whether the case requires supplemental briefing or can be resubmitted on the existing briefs and arguments. See, e.g., Espinosa v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc., 530 F.3d 895, 899 (9th Cir. 2008) (per curiam); Eyak Native Village v. Daley, 375 F.3d 1218, 1219 (9th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (order). Petition for panel rehearing GRANTED; previous opinion VACATED; petition for rehearing en banc DENIED AS MOOT; SUBMISSION VACATED; REMANDED FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE. [9153488]