Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

13-50461 - USA v. Peter Pocklington


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
13-50461 - USA v. Peter Pocklington
July 2, 2015
PDF | More
FILED OPINION (ANDREW J. KLEINFELD, M. MARGARET MCKEOWN and MILAN D. SMITH, JR.) VACATED Judge: MMM Authoring, FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [9596761]
August 4, 2016
PDF | More
Filed Order for PUBLICATION (ANDREW J. KLEINFELD, M. MARGARET MCKEOWN and MILAN D. SMITH, JR.) (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) After careful review of the record, including briefing and argument on the merits and briefing on the Hyde Amendment, we conclude, though the question is close, that the government’s position was not frivolous. We decline to assess fees against the government for testing an essentially untested legal idea. Pocklington’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs under the Hyde Amendment is DENIED. [10075101]