Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-15469 - Naruto v. David Slater, et al

Download Files


Document in Context
16-15469 - Naruto v. David Slater, et al
April 23, 2018
PDF | More
FILED OPINION (CARLOS T. BEA, N. RANDY SMITH and EDUARDO C. ROBRENO) Counsel for Slater and Wildlife requests that the court grant him appellate-stage attorneys’ fees and remand to the district court for the determination of the amount of those fees. Counsel for Slater and Wildlife is entitled to attorneys’ fees and costs for this appeal. See Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517, 534 n.19 (1994). Thus, the request in the answering brief by Slater and Wildlife for an award of attorneys’ fees on appeal is granted. The determination of an appropriate amount of fees on appeal is transferred to the district court pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 39-1.8. AFFIRMED. Judge: CTB Authoring, Judge: NRS Concurring, FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [10845881]