Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

16-35010 - Cheryl Kater v. Churchill Downs Inc.

Download Files


Document in Context
16-35010 - Cheryl Kater v. Churchill Downs Inc.
March 28, 2018
PDF | More
FILED OPINION (MILAN D. SMITH, JR., MARY H. MURGUIA and EDUARDO C. ROBRENO) We grant Kater’s motion to take judicial notice of the slideshow, meeting minutes, and pamphlet because they are publicly available on the Washington government website, and neither party disputes the authenticity of the website nor the accuracy of the information. See Daniels-Hall v. Nat’l Educ. Ass’n, 629 F.3d 992, 998–99 (9th Cir. 2010) (citing Fed. R. Evid. 201). We deny Churchill Downs’ motion to substitute Big Fish Games, Inc. as Defendant-Appellee in place of Churchill Downs pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(b).(SEE OPINION FOR FULL TEXT) REVERSED AND REMANDED. Judge: MDS Authoring, FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [10815246]