Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)

14-7009 - David Sickle, et al v. Torres Advanced Enterprise, et al

Download Files


Document in Context
14-7009 - David Sickle, et al v. Torres Advanced Enterprise, et al
June 7, 2016
PDF | More
PER CURIAM JUDGMENT [1617223] filed (without memorandum) that the judgment of the district court dismissing Appellants' claims under 33 U.S.C. § 948a and 42 U.S.C. § 1651(a) be affirmed. FURTHER ORDERED that, in light of the dismissal of Appellants’ only federal-law claims, the record be remanded to the district court for a determination whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists to decide Appellants’ remaining common-law claims, either as a discretionary exercise of supplemental jurisdiction or diversity jurisdiction as the amended complaint asserts. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, as this court retains jurisdiction over this appeal, this case will be held in abeyance pending resolution of the limited jurisdictional question on remand. Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein pending resolution of the remainder of the appeal. See FED. R. APP. P. 41(b); D.C. CIR. R. 41. Before Judges: Rogers, Srinivasan and Millett. [14-7009]
March 9, 2018
PDF | More
OPINION [1721433] filed (Pages: 20) for the Court by Judge Millett. [14-7009]