Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

16-653 - Centeno et al v. City Of Fresno et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
16-653 - Centeno et al v. City Of Fresno et al
June 9, 2016
PDF | More
PROTECTIVE ORDER re CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/9/2016. (Kusamura, W)
June 13, 2016
PDF | More
Heriberta Centeno and Jose Centeno Have Been Dismissed With Prejudice From the First, Second, and Fourth Claims for Relief, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/12/16. (Marrujo, C)
July 22, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER Regarding Settlement Conference (set for March 29, 2017 at 9:30 am before Judge McAuliffe). PERSONAL Appearance by Plaintiff and Defense Counsel Required. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/22/2016. (Herman, H)
December 29, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF Nos. 19, 20, 23, 24) and ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION FROM THE RECORD (ECF No. 20): It is hereby ordered that Plaintiff's motion to compel is GRANTED IN PART and on or before January 17, 2017, Defendant shall produce supplemental responses to Plaintiff's request for production of document as follows: (a) Officer Lucero's February 24, 2009 shooting incident; (b) The Gonzalez incident; (c) The complaint of unreasonable use of force on March 24, 2016 against Officers Lucero and Price; and (d) All documents that relate to the training or discipline on the use of force in Officers Lucero and Price's discipline files for the period of September 3, 2010 through the present; On or before January 10, 2017, Defendant shall submit to the Court all performance evaluations for Officers Lucero and Price for the period from September 3, 2010 through the present for in camera review; The remainder of Plaintiff's motion to compel is denied; and Defendants opposition (ECF No. 20), except for the attached declarations and exhibits, is STRICKEN from the record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/29/2016. (Valdez, E)
December 30, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF No. 30): It is hereby ordered that the parties' stipulation to amend the July 21, 2016 scheduling order is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/30/2016. (Valdez, E)
January 19, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER Following In Camera Review signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/18/2017. (Jessen, A)
March 10, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER Amending Scheduling Order Pursuant to Stipulation of the Parties, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/10/2017. (Kusamura, W)
April 13, 2017
PDF | More
STIPULATION and Joint Request of the Parties to RESET the Mandatory Settlement Conference; ORDER: the Settlement Conference is continued from March 29, 2017 to June 8, 2017 at 9:30AM before Judge McAuliffe in Courtroom 8 (BAM). Confidential statements, not filed, due ONE WEEK prior to June 8, 2017 and sent as an attachment to [email protected], signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/13/2017. (Herman, H)
August 30, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' 40 Motion for Summary Judgment, and Denying Defendants' 48 Motion in Limine No. 1, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/30/2017. (The parties are directed to contact Courtroom Deputy Renee Gaumnitz at (559) 499-5652, or [email protected], within fourteen days of service of this order.) (Gaumnitz, R)
March 13, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER Granting Stay of Entire Action Pending Interlocutory Appeal, Declining to Certify Interlocutory Appeal as Frivolous, and Denying Pretrial Motions in Limine as Moot, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/13/2018. (1. Defendants' 86 motion to stay this action is granted, and the court stays this case in its entirety pending resolution of defendants' interlocutory appeal; 2. Plaintiffs' 89 motion to certify defendants' interlocutory appeal as frivolous is denied; and 3. The parties' pretrial motions in limine (Doc. Nos. 65-70; 71-76) are denied as having been rendered moot by this order granting a stay of the action in its entirety, without prejudice to the renewal of those motions in limine, if appropriate, by re-noticing them for hearing and incorporating them by reference in such a notice.) (Gaumnitz, R)