Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-499 - Peterson v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-499 - Peterson v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
June 5, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER GRANTING Second Extension of Time for Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC shall file its responsive pleading by no later than June 14, 2017. This extension does not impact or change any event or deadline already set by the Court. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/5/2017. (Timken, A)
August 23, 2017
PDF | More
SCHEDULING ORDER. The parties are ordered to have exchanged the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) on or before August 18, 2017. Any motions or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings must be filed by no later than December 13, 2017. Class certification discovery shall be completed by no later than March 2, 2018. Expert witnesses opining on issues of class certification shall be disclosed by January 19, 2018. Rebuttal expert witnesses shall be disclosed by February 16, 2018. The motion for class certification shall be filed by no later than April 6, 2018. Any opposition to the motion for class certification shall be filed by no later than May 4, 2018. Any reply brief in support of the motion for class certification shall be filed by no later than May 18, 2018. The motion for class certification shall be heard by no later than June 6, 2018, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable Lawrence J. ONeill, Chief United States District Judge. A mid-discovery status conference to set further scheduling dates, as needed, is set for August 7, 2018, at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom 7 before U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/23/2017. (Timken, A)
February 14, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER of DISMISSAL 25, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/13/2018: This action has been dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff and without prejudice as to the Putative Class, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the parties will bear their own respective costs and expenses. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to close this case. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)