Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

17-1339 - Engelbrecht v. Ripa


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
17-1339 - Engelbrecht v. Ripa
October 17, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER Denying 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/16/2017. Fourteen-Day Deadline. (Flores, E)
December 5, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER GRANTING Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/4/2017. (Jessen, A)
January 30, 2018
PDF | More
ORDER directing Plaintiff as follows: 1) Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint curing the deficiencies identified by the Court in this order if she believes additional true factual allegations would state a claim, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order; 2) If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, Plaintiff shall caption the amended complaint First Amended Complaint and refer to the case number 1:17-cv-01339-LJO-EPG; 3) Alternatively, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff may notify the Court that she wishes to stand on her original complaint, subject to this Court issuing findings and recommendations to the assigned district court judge recommending that the case be dismissed for failure to state a claim; and 4) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or notify the Court that she wishes to stand on this complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, the Court will issue findings and recommendations to the assigned district court judge recommending that Plaintiff's case be dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to comply with a Court order. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/30/2018. (Rooney, M)
July 16, 2018
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff be allowed to proceed only on her claim for breach of contract against Defendant and that all other claims be dismissed with prejudice. The Court does not recommend granting further leave to amend because Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint after receiving ample legal guidance from the Court, and it appears that the deficiencies of the First Amended Complaint cannot be cured by further leave to amend. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the district judge assigned to the case, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one (21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the Court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/16/208. (Rooney, M)