Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

04-1797 - (PC) Brummett v. Teske, et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
04-1797 - (PC) Brummett v. Teske, et al
July 28, 2005
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 7/27/05 ORDERING that w/in 30 days of this order the Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the 32 Motion to Dismiss. Failure to comply will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Sherman, T)
January 11, 2006
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that dfts' 32 06/24/05 motion to dismiss be denied; dfts' 33 06/27/05 motion to dismiss be denied and dfts be directed to answer pltf's amd cmp; signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 01/11/06. (Kirkpatrick, S)
February 27, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. on 2/24/06 ORDERING that: the 42 F&R's are ADOPTED in FULL; the 32&33 Motions to Dismiss are DENIED; and, Dfts shall answer pltf's amended complaint w/in 10 days from the date of this order.(Brown, T)
May 18, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 5/17/06 ORDERING Pltf's 2/24/06 motion for summary judgment 44 is DENIED w/out PREJUDICE. (Girgis, C)
June 7, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 6/5/06 ORDERING Pltf's 2/24/06 letter and the documents appended thereto 45 will be DISREGARDED. (Girgis, C)
November 14, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 11/13/2006 ORDERING 64 Motion to Compel is DENIED; 75 Motion for Extension of time is GRANTED; Pltf is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order in which to file and serve an opposition to the 9/1/2006 motion for summary judgment, said dfts; reply if any is due 7 days thereafter; Dfts Teske and Miller are GRANTED 15 days from the date of this order to file and serve a motion for summary judgment grounded in the arguments raised in their 3/22/2006 opposition to pltf's 2/24/06 motion for summary judgment.(Matson, R)
December 8, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 12/7/2006 ORDERING: 85 Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED; 75 Motion for Extension of time is GRANTED; Pltf's 9/27/2006 opposition to the 9/1/2006 motion for summary judgment of defendants Blankenship, Johnson and Shasta County Jail is deemed timely filed; 83 Request for subpoena forms is DENIED w/out prejudice; The pretrial conference set for 12/22/2006 before the undersigned and the jury trial set for 3/13/2007 before the Honorable Garland E. Burrell, Jr. are VACATED. (Matson, R)
February 22, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 2/21/07 ORDERING that Pltf's 90 Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED. Pltf's 88 brief is construed as his opposition to Dfts' Motion for Summary Judgment. Pltf's 79 Motion to Exclude his deposition evidence is DENIED. Pltf's 9/27/06 brief will be placed in the file and DISREGARDED. Dfts' 89 Objections are OVERRULED. Dfts are GRANTED 10 days to file a reply to Pltf's 12/13/06 opposition or, in the alternative, to stand on their 10/5/06 reply. At that time the matter will stand submitted.(Engbretson, K.)
June 13, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 6/13/07 ORDERING that Dfts' 9/1/06 Motion for Summary Judgment 67 is DENIED without prejudice. The dispositive motion deadline is extended to 8/15/07. Any further court filing shall be served on Pltf, counsel for Dfts Blankenship, Johnson and Shasta County Jail, and counsel for defendants Teske and Miller. (Engbretson, K.)
February 6, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ordering the 11/02/07 118 Request for Judicial Notice is granted. It is hereby recommended that Defendants' 08/14/07 motion for summary judgment (docket no. 98) be granted. Defendants' August 15, 2007 motion for summary judgment (docket no. 99) be granted. Motions 98, 99 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M)
March 17, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL 119 signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/17/08: Defendants' August 14, 2007 motion for summary judgment is granted 98. Defendants' August 15, 2007 motion for summary judgment is granted 99.CASE CLOSED.(Kaminski, H)