Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

04-2361 - (PC) Frutos v. CA Dept Corrections, et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
04-2361 - (PC) Frutos v. CA Dept Corrections, et al
May 11, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 5/10/06 ORDERING That w/in 15 days from the date of this order pltf shall inform the court in writing of the status of his request for a refund from Western Union.(Girgis, C)
June 13, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 6/12/06 ORDERING that: pltf's 11 Application for an Extension of Time is GRANTED; and pltf shall file a response to the court's 5/11/06 9 Order on or before 6/24/06. (Brown, T)
September 13, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF INMATE FILING FEE signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 9/12/06: The Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation or a designee shall collect monthly payments from plaintiff's prison trust account. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's in forma pauperis affidavit on Director of CDC. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department. (Kaminski, H)
November 14, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/13/06 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 9/27/06 Motion for Reconsideration 18 is DENIED. Service is appropriate for the following Defendants: Reed, Hubbard, Wagner, Stone, Colon, Porter, Rianda, Castro, Runnels, and Terhune. The Clerk shall send Plaintiff 10 USM-285 forms, one summons, and instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed 10/18/06. Within thirty days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the Court: The completed Notice of Submission of Documents; one completed summons, one completed USM-285 form for each defendant, eleven copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed 10/18/06. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
January 22, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/19/07 ORDERING that: the Clerk is DIRECTED to forward the instr for service of process, the completed summons, copies of the 10/18/06 Amended Complaint, and copies of this order to the USM; w/in 10 days from the date of this order, the USM is DIRECTED to notify dfts Reed, Hubbard, Wagner, Stone, Colon, Porter, Rianda, Castro, Runnels&Terhune of the commencenent if this action and to request a waiver of service of summons; and the Clerk shall serve upon pltf a copy of the Local Rules of the Court. (cc: USM Priority)(Brown, T)
April 2, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/30/07 ORDERING that Dfts' Request for an Extension of Time 27 is GRANTED. Dfts have until 4/27/07 to file their response to the complaint. (Engbretson, K.)
June 4, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/04/07: Pltf's 05/21/07 34 Request is GRANTED; pltf shall file and serve an Opposition to dfts' 04/26/07 Motion to Dismiss on or before 06/17/07. (Kirkpatrick, S)
July 24, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 07/24/07 ORDERING that the pltf's 06/22/07 request is GRANTED; opposition due on or before 06/24/07. There will be no further extensions of time. (Manzer, C)
August 2, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 8/2/07 ORDERING The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to pltf 1 USM-285 form, instruction sheet and a copy of the 10/18/06 amended complaint 22; Within 60 days from the date of this order, pltf shall complete and submit the attached Notice of Submission of Documents to the court. 44 (Reader, L)
August 2, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 8/2/2007 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court shall serve on plaintiff forthwith a copy of the USM-285 form returned by the United States Marshal on May 22, 2007, together with this order. 35(Reader, L)
November 1, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 11/1/07. Defendants' 30 40 Motion(s) to Dismiss are GRANTED for part of Complaint that seeks compensatory and punitive damages and DENIED to part seeking declaratory or injunctive relief. (Marciel, M)
November 14, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 11/13/07 ORDERING that dfts SHOW CAUSE within 14 days why this matter should be tried before a jury since the only remaining claims are for injunctive relief and declaratory relief. (Kastilahn, A)
December 17, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 12/14/07 ORDERING that dfts are ORDERED to Show Cause w/i 14 days why they should not be sanctioned for failure to respond to the 52 Court's 11/13/07 order.(Benson, A)
February 19, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Circuit Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 02/15/08 DENYING 57 request to conduct discovery or file a motion for summary judgment; pltf is advised that the Court has considered the 56 motion for appt of counsel and is in the process of attempting to find an attorney who will agree to act as counsel for pltf. (Manzer, C)
March 3, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Circuit Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 2/29/08 ORDERING that the 3/4/08 Pretrial Conference is VACATED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
May 19, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Senior Circuit Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 05/19/08; dfts shall show cause by 05/22/08 why they should not be sanctioned for failure to respond to the Court's order. (Manzer, C)
May 29, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Circuit Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 5/29/08 GRANTING 62 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Case is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
June 23, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Circuit Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 6/23/08: Defendants have up to and including July 12, 2008, to serve their response to the motion. No other extensions will be granted. (Kaminski, H)
July 21, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Circuit Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 7/18/08 ORDERING that plaintiff's 82 reply is DENIED as moot.(Duong, D)