Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

04-2560 - (PC) Williby v. Woodford, et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
04-2560 - (PC) Williby v. Woodford, et al
August 26, 2005
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 8/25/05 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 3 Request for IFP is GRANTED and Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is DISMISSED w/30 days leave to amend. (Sherman, T) Modified on 9/6/2005 (Sherman, T).
October 13, 2005
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 10/12/05: plaintiff's 09/26/05 7 ex parte request for an extension of time is GRANTED; plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file an amended complaint. (Kirkpatrick, S)
November 18, 2005
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 11/17/05: pltf's 11/14/05 9 request for an extension of time is GRANTED; pltf is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file an amended complaint. (Kirkpatrick, S)
March 10, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 3/9/2006 ordering that service is appropriate for dfts Woodford, Kanan, Carey, Traquina, McIntyre, Kurk, Cheung, Sheehan, Knudsen, Whitfield, Chirilla, and Soliz. The Clerk to send pltf forms for service to be completed and returned w/in 30 days.(Matson, R)
April 11, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER DIRECTING USM WITHOUT PREPAYMENT signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 4/7/06 ORDERING Clerk is directed to forward all necessary forms to USM; USM to serve process w/in 10 days on dfts A. Traquina, J Whitfield, Knudsen, Tom L. Carey, Jeanne S. Woodford, McIntyre, Kurk, Cheung, Sheehan, M. Chirilla, N. Soliz, and Renee Kanan; Clerk is directed to serve copy of the local rules on pltf.(Girgis, C)
August 31, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge David F. Levi on 8/30/2006 ORDERING The Court AFFIRMS the Magistrate Judge's order of 3/10/2006 and 12, and DENIES 13 Pltf's Objections. This matter will go forward on the basis of the 3/10/2006 order. (Reader, L)
February 27, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 2/26/2007 DENYING 27 Motion for Default Judgment. (Matson, R)
February 27, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 2/26/2007 ORDERING 22 Motion to Strike is construed as an opposition to the motion to dismiss; and IT IS RECOMMENDED that Dfts' 6/12/2006 mtn to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part; Pltf's claims of racial discrimination, excessive force, and failure to protect raised against dfts be dismissed w/out prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to suit; This action proceed solely on pltf's Eighth Amendment and pendent statelaw negligence claims arising from allegations that dfts failed to provide or authorize required dental work; Dfts be required to answer, w/in 10 days from the date of any order by the district court adopting these F&R's; and Pltf's 7/24/2006 motion for Rule 11 sanctions be denied.Objections to the F&R's are due w/in 10 days.(Matson, R)
March 20, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 33 signed by Judge David F. Levi on 3/19/07 ORDERING Dfts' 21 motion to dismiss is GRANTED in Part and DENIED in Part. Pltf's claims of racial discrimination, excessive force, and failure to protect raised against dfts Whitfield, Knudsen, Chirilla and Soliz are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to suit. This action shall proceed solely on pltf's 8th Amendment and pendent state law negligence claims arising from allegations that dfts Woodford, Kanan, Carey, Traquina, McIntyre, Kurk, Cheung and Sheehan failed to provide or authorize required dental work. Dfts Woodford, Kanan, Carey, Traquina, McIntyre, Kurk, Cheung and Sheehan shall answer, within 10 days from the date this order, pltf's 8th Amendment and pendent state law negligence claims arising from their alleged failure to provide or authorize required dental work. Pltf's Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions is DENIED 24. (Reader, L)
August 15, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 8/15/07 DENYING 40 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and for Sanctions. Within 45 days from this order, defendants shall serve responses to the discovery requests they received from plaintiff on 6/11/07. (Davis, D)
October 10, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 10/09/07 ORDERING that pursuant to 46 Request, dfts' responses to discovery requests are due 11/05/07; Dispositive Motions due by 01/07/08 and the remaining scheduling order dates shall be VACATED until further order of the Court.(Benson, A)
January 10, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 1/9/08 ORDERING dfts' 1/7/08 request for extension of time 48 is GRANTED; dfts' 1/8/08 motion for summary judgment is deemed timely filed. (Carlos, K)
August 22, 2008
PDF | More
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 8/21/08 Recommending that Plaintiff's 1/7/08 motion for Summary Judgment 52 be denied. Defendants' 1/8/08 Motion for summary judgment 49 be granted; Summary judgment be entered for defendants on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim; Plaintiff's state law claims be dismissed. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S District Judge John A. Mendez. Within twenty days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 2, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 67 in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/30/2008; DENYING Plaintiff's 52 motion for summary judgment; GRANTING Defendants' 49 motion for summary judgment; Summary judgment is entered for defendants on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim; and Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)