Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

05-2610 - (HC) Panko v. Schwartz


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
05-2610 - (HC) Panko v. Schwartz
January 9, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Peter A. Nowinski on 01/05/06: respondent is directed to respond to petitioner's application within 60 days from the date of this order; the Clerk shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's 12/23/05 1 petition for HC to Jo Graves, Senior Assistant AG.(Kirkpatrick, S)
May 3, 2006
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John F. Moulds on 05/03/06 ORDERING respondent's 03/13/06 first amended motion to dismiss 10 is DENIED without prejudice to renewal after the appellate court's decision in Sass. (Warren, P)
November 5, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 11/5/07 ORDERING respondent is directed to file either a renewed motion to dismiss or an answer to the petition within thirty-five (35) days. An answer shall be accompanied by all transcripts and other documents relevant to the issues presented in the petition. Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of the petition on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General.(cc: Michael Patrick Farrell)(Becknal, R)
December 19, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 12/19/07 ORDERING that the parties are directed to file, on or before December 31, 2007, simultaneous briefs consisting of no more than 7 pages, discussing the following issues: (1) What is the applicability, if any, of Irons v. Carey, 479 F.3d 658 (9th Cir.2007) to the question whether Petitioner is entitled to habeas relief on his claim that denial of his parole application violated due process? (2) Is a District Court required to grant habeas relief on the basis of the law of the Ninth Circuit when that law does not represent "clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States," 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254(d) (1)? (Duong, D)
December 26, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 12/21/07: Petitioner's motion is granted 21. Both parties are directed to file the simultaneous briefs described in the December 19, 2007 order by January 30, 2008. (Kaminski, H)
June 4, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Circuit Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on 6/4/08 ORDERING that petitioner's application for habeas corpus relief is DENIED. CASE CLOSED.(Duong, D)