Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

07-1119 - Vaughn, et al v. USA (FBI), et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
07-1119 - Vaughn, et al v. USA (FBI), et al
November 13, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/13/07 ORDERING that pursuant to the plaintiffs ex parte motion 19, the Sacramento County Sheriff's Office (Sacramento County) and the Alameda County Sheriff's Office (Alameda County) are DISMISSED from this action, with prejudice. (Duong, D)
November 19, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/16/07. Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss premised on failure to allege policy or custome is GRANTED but Motion to Strike is DENIED. Plaintiff given 30 days to file an Amended Complaint. (Marciel, M)
November 27, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/27/07 DENYING the City of Sacramento's motion to dismiss as moot. (Manzer, C)
December 12, 2007
PDF | More
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/11/07 ORDERING thatDiscovery ddl 8/1/2008; Dispositive Hearing Motion ddl 10/1/2008. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/5/2009 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Jury Trial set for 4/7/2009 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the federal defendants and the City of Richmond are DISMISSED.(Duong, D)
August 14, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/14/08 ORDERING pltfs to SHOW CAUSE in writing by 8/27/08 why sanctions should not issue in the this case in the amt of $150 for the failure to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition. Pltfs must file and serve their opposition or statement of non-opposiition to the pending Motion for Summary Judgment no later than 8/18/08 at 5:00 PM. Dfts' reply, if any, must be filed on or before 8/25/08. The Motion for Summary Judgment hearing is CONT'D to 9/8/2008 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Kastilahn, A)
August 15, 2008
PDF | More
DISCHARGED PURSUANT TO 48 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/15/08. Plaintiffs must file and serve their Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to pending Motion on or before 9/8/08. Defendants' Reply, if any, must be filed on or before 9/15/08. The 41 42 Motions for Summary Judgment Hearing is CONTINUED to 9/22/2008 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK). (Marciel, M) Modified on 8/28/2008 (Becknal, R).
August 28, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/27/08 ORDERING that the order to show cause 45 is DISCHARGED. (Becknal, R) Modified on 8/28/2008 (Becknal, R).
September 16, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/15/08 ORDERING that the court GRANTS dft City of Sacramento's motion for summary judgment. The Clerk is directed to close the case.CASE CLOSED(Kastilahn, A)
October 10, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/09/08 ORDERING that plaintiffs counsel is substituted for in propria persona representation. Counsel is ORDERED to release all client papers and property to client within (15) days of the date of this order, including correspondences, pleadings, deposition transcripts, exhibits, physical evidence, expert reports, and otheritems reasonably necessary to the client's representation, whether the client has paid for them or not, in accordance with Rule 3-700(D) of the California Rules of Professional Conduct. (Becknal, R)