Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

07-1546 - (PS) Hensley et al v. USDC Eastern District of California et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
07-1546 - (PS) Hensley et al v. USDC Eastern District of California et al
September 21, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/21/2007 GRANTING 5 Ex Parte Application filed by William Boyd Ritner; is hereby given an additional 30 days in which to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. (Reader, L)
November 5, 2007
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/2/07 ORDERING that application of the USA for leave to appear as amicus curiae in this action and for an extension fo time for defendant Magistrage Judge Mueller to respond to plaintiff's complaint is GRANTED. The time for defendant Magistrate Judge Mueller to answer, move, or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint is stayed until further order of court. The Clerk shall file the 39 page memorandum of law and accompanying exhibits submitted by amicus curiae USA. Plaintiffs are GRANTED ten court days from the date of this order to file a response to the memorandum of law served with this order. Plaintiffs are cautioned that any response to the memorandum must be received for filing by the Clerk of or before the specified deadline; a response received for filing after that date will not be considered by the court. (Anderson, J)
February 19, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER granting defendant's 18 39 46 Requests for Judicial Notice; and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, recommending that defendants' 11 37 38 Motions to Dismiss be granted and all claims against these defendants be dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/15/08. Within 10 days after being served with these F/Rs, any party may file written Objections with Court. (Marciel, M)
March 10, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/10/08 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 61 Notice of Motion to Amended Filings has been defectively noticed and will not be set for hearing. Plaintiff's 61 Motion to amend findings are DENIED. Plaintiff's motion will be construed as plaintiff's objections to the findings and recommendations. Defendant's replies, if any, shall be filed and served within 10 calendar days after this order is filed.(Anderson, J)
March 26, 2008
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 3/25/08 ORDERING pltf's request 63 filed 3/24/08, the order of the magistrate judge filed 3/10/08 is AFFIRMED; the F&R's 60 are ADOPTED IN FULL; the motion to dismiss 11 filed 8/27/08 by dfts Ventura Cty Superior Court, Michael D. Planet, L.A. County Superior Court, and John Clarke is GRANTED, and all claims against these dfts are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; dft Ritner's motion to dismiss 37 is GRANTED; and all claims against this dft are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for lack of capacity to be sued; dft Coleman's motion to dismiss 38 is GRANTED, and all claims against this dft are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; all claims against dft Davis are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; all claims against dft US District Court Eastern District of CA (Kimberly J. Mueller as a US District Judge) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because the dft is entitled to immunity; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for all dfts and close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)