Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

09-362 - USA v. Vue


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
09-362 - USA v. Vue
November 20, 2009
PDF | More
ORDER and WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/20/09 GRANTING 4 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum as to Sue Vue (1); the Custodian and the USM shall produce the detainee, forthwith, and any further proceedings to be had in this cause. (Manzer, C)
December 3, 2009
PDF | More
DETENTION ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/3/09 as to Sue Vue. (Owen, K)
May 27, 2010
PDF | More
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE as to Sue Vue signed by Senior Judge Edward J. Garcia on 5/20/10. (Attachments: # (1) transcript) (Kaminski, H)
June 24, 2010
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Edward J. Garcia on 6/22/2010 ORDERING 32 Trial Confirmation Hearing ADVANCED for 6/25/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EJG) before Senior Judge Edward J. Garcia, as to Sue Vue. (Reader, L)
August 10, 2010
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER as to Sue Vue signed by Senior Judge Edward J. Garcia on 8/9/10 ORDERING the Gov't shall have until 9/17/10 to respond to the motion for a new trial 62. (Carlos, K)
September 22, 2010
PDF | More
PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE as to Sue Vue, signed by Senior Judge Edward J. Garcia on 9/16/10. (Kastilahn, A)
October 1, 2010
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER 69 for continuance of Briefing Schedule signed by Senior Judge Edward J. Garcia on 9/30/2010. Defendant's 62 Motion for New Trial Hearing is RE-SCHEDULED for 10/8/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EJG) Government shall have until 10/4/2010 to response to Motion. Any reply shall be filed by 10/6/2010. (Marciel, M)
October 20, 2010
PDF | More
JUDGMENT and COMMITMENT as to Sue Vue signed by Senior Judge Edward J. Garcia on October 20, 2010. (Lydon, C)
January 4, 2011
PDF | More
FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE signed by Senior Judge Edward J. Garcia on 12/30/2010 ORDERING 89 A Final Order of Forfeiture shall be ENTERED forfeiting to the USA all right, title, and interest in the listed property pursuant to 18:924(d)(1) and 28:2461(c), to be disposed of according to law, including all right, title, and interest of Sue Vue. All right, title, and interest in the listed property shall vest solely in the name of the USA. The US Marshals Service shall maintain custody of and control over the subject property until it is disposed of according to law. (Reader, L)
June 8, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/8/2016 as to Sue Vue re 96 MOTION to VACATE, Set Aside or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255: The United States shall file an opposition to petitioner's motion no later than 7/8/2016. Petitioner may then file a reply no later than 7/25/2016. The court will then take the motion under submission and will inform the parties if oral argument or further proceedings are necessary. (Kirksey Smith, K)
July 13, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/13/2016 as to Sue Vue re 104 Government's MOTION for EXTENSION of TIME: The court will grant an extension of time but does not find a sufficient basis for such a lengthy extension. Therefore, plaintiff's response is now due 7/28/2016. Defendant's reply, if any, shall be filed on or before 8/15/2016. (Kirksey Smith, K)
July 14, 2016
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/13/16 ORDERING that petitioner's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Docket No. 96) is referred to a Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The previously set briefing schedule (Docket No. 99) shall remain in effect. (Becknal, R)
April 27, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/27/17 as to Sue Vue: Within seven days of this order's entry, Vue shall file a response indicating whether he intends to pursue this motion further. If he responds in the affirmative, this court will enter a schedule for supplemental briefing for the parties to fully address the effect of Beckles on this case. (Kaminski, H)