Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

10-508 - Hall et al v. City of Fairfield et al


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
10-508 - Hall et al v. City of Fairfield et al
February 2, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/2/11 GRANTING 22 Motion to Compel with regard to pltf's request for production nos. 4 and 7, and with respect to the appearance of dfts Sandoval and Shackford to give further deposition testimony. All documents shall be produced on or before 2/22/11. (Manzer, C)
March 22, 2011
PDF | More
STIPULATION and ORDER 34 to Protect Confidential Information, signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/21/11. (Kastilahn, A)
August 23, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/22/11 DENYING 40 Stipulation and Proposed Order For Expedited ruling on Defendants In-N-Out Burger and Marc L. Young's motion to approve the Stipulation re Good Faith Settlement. (Matson, R)
September 13, 2011
PDF | More
d. Pltfs state this sealing request is made in connection with their motion for summary adjudication. Pltfs' "Request to Seal Documents" should have been filed on the public docket, the Clerk shall file pltfs' "Request to Seal Documents" on the public docket. Pltfs indicate their authority justifying sealing the other documents is a "Stipulation and Order to Protect Confidential Information" 35. However, this authority has not been shown sufficient toORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/12/11 ORDERING that Pltfs submitted to chambers via an email to the Courtroom Deputy, for an in camera consideration, a "Request to Seal Documents" and the documents Pltfs seek to have seale justify the sealing request; therefore, the request is Denied. (Becknal, R)
September 22, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/21/2011 GRANTING In-N-Out Burger and Marc L. Young's 39 amended motion to find good faith settlement agreement. (Zignago, K.)
December 7, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/7/2011 DENYING 67 Motion to Seal; Motion for Sanctions. (Michel, G)
December 20, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/19/11 DENYING 68 Motion to Supplement Expert Witness Disclosure. (Meuleman, A)
January 12, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/11/12; the cross motions for summary judgment of each Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment unlawful arrest claim against each Defendant Officer is denied; Defendants Grimm, Sandoval, Shackford and Crane's motion for summary judgment of their defense of qualified immunity against each Plaintiff's federal unlawful arrest claim is granted; Defendant City of Fairfield's motion for summary judgment of Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment unlawful arrest claim alleged under Monell is granted and Plaintiffs' motion is denied; Defendants' motion for summary judgment of Plaintiff Hall's Fourth Amendment excessive force claim is granted; Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted on each Plaintiff's claim alleged under Civil Code section 51.7 and denied on each Plaintiffs' Civil Code section 52.1 claim; Defendant Officers' motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs state battery and unlawful arrest claims is denied; and each Plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim is dismissed, Plaintiff Monique Rankin's Fourth Amendment excessive force claim is dismissed, and Plaintiff Monique Rankin's state battery claim is dismissed. (Matson, R)
March 23, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/23/12 re: Defendants' Objections to Final Pretrial Order; Supplement to Final Pretrial Order. (Donati, J)
April 4, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER RE TWO TRIAL DOCUMENTS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 4/3/2012. Attached are the Court's voir dire questions and preliminary jury instructions. The Court notes that certain of Plaintiffs' proposed voir dire questions appear aimed at "lay[ing] a foundation for [their] case," and inappropriately seek to instruct the jury on the law. DeLaCruz v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 405 F.2d 459, 462 (5th Cir. 1968). "While... a [party] is entitled to a voir dire that fairly and adequately probes a juror's qualifications, a [party] is not necessarily entitled to test the jurors on their capacity to accept his [or her] theory of the case." United States v. Toomey,764 F.2d 678, 683 (9th Cir. 1985). Further, the parties are notified that the Court only has nine court days within which trial must be completed. Therefore, if a party reasonably opines that more time is needed, that party shall request a continuance of the trial date. (Zignago, K.)
April 5, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/4/12. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
April 11, 2012
PDF | More
TENTATIVE RULING GRANTING SUA SPONTE PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS ON PLAINTIFFS' STATE LAW FALSE ARREST CLAIMS signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 4/10/12. "Because the undisputed facts indicate that [Defendants] accepted delivery of [Plaintiffs] after [Young] made a citizen's arrest," partial summary judgment on Plaintiffs' state law false arrest claim is tentatively GRANTED. Arpin, 261 F.3d at 921 (9th Cir. 2001). Any party may file and serve written objections to any part of this tentative ruling no later than 5/14/12. Any objection must specify the requested correction, addition, and/or deletion. Any response to an objection shall be filed and served no later than 5/21/12. If no objection is filed, this tentative ruling will become final without further order of this Court. If an objection is filed, this matter may be scheduled for hearing on 6/4/12 at 9:00 a.m. (Kastilahn, A)
January 7, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/7/2013 ORDERING that partial summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of Defendants on Plaintiffs' state law false arrest claims. Further, Defendants' request to expand the Tentative Ruling to grant summary judgment on Plaintiffs federal false arrest claims is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
January 28, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/25/2013 ORDERING that a Trial Confirmation Hearing is set for 4/12/2013, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned. The Jury Trial, estimated length of approximately twelve court days, is set to commence on 4/29/2013, at 9:00 a.m., before the undersigned. (Zignago, K.)
April 18, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/17/13 ORDERING that the Defendants' request for reconsideration is DENIED; the parties' joint request for additional time for voir dire and opening statements is GRANTED; the Jury Trial is confirmed to commence on 4/29/13 at 9:00 a.m. (Manzer, C)
March 31, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/31/2014 GRANTING 216 Motion to Amend the Judgment; AMENDING the judgment to reflect that the plaintiffs' claim that they were arrested without probable cause in violation of their rights under the Fourth Amendment is entered in their favor against Defendant McDowell only; DENYING 216 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the alternative, Motion for a New Trial. (Michel, G)
March 31, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/31/2014 GRANTING IN PART 211 Motion for Attorney Fees; AWARDING the plaintiffs a total of $308,221.80 in attorneys' fees. (Michel, G)
March 30, 2015
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/27/2015 ORDERING that the parties' 254 joint motion to vacate judgment is conditionally GRANTED subject to the granting of plaintiffs' petitions for determinations of factual innocence by the Solano County Superior Court. As requested by the parties, after the Solano County Superior Court rules upon plaintiffs' petitions for factual innocence, plaintiffs' counsel shall notify the court of the decision of the Solano County Superior Court. If the Solano County Superior Court grants the plaintiffs' petitions for determinations of factual innocence, this court will issue an order vacating the judgment in this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). (Zignago, K.)
March 31, 2017
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/30/2017 ORDERING that the judgment in this action is VACATED pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Zignago, K.)