Skip to content.
About GPO   |   Newsroom/Media   |   Congressional Relations   |   Inspector General   |   Careers   |   Contact   |   askGPO   |   Help  
 

  FDsys > More Information
(Search string is required)
 

11-209 - Rodas v. Creditors Specialty Service, Inc.


Download Files

Metadata

Document in Context
11-209 - Rodas v. Creditors Specialty Service, Inc.
September 7, 2011
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/6/11 ORDERING that the Plaintiff's counsel's request to appear telephonically at the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint on 9/21/11, is hereby granted. (Becknal, R)
March 28, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/27/2012 GRANTING 28 Stipulation to Amend the Scheduling Order. Discovery Cutoff: 6/22/2012; Dispositive Motion filing: 8/8/2012; Dispositive Motion Hearing: 9/5/2012 at 9:30 AM; Joint Pretrial Statement due: 10/3/2012; Pretrial Conference RESET for 10/10/2012 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez; Jury Trial RESET for 11/26/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Michel, G)
June 27, 2012
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/26/12 DENYING AS UNTIMELY 32 Amended Motion to Compel. The Motion is DROPPED from the court's 7/6/12 law and motion calendar. (Meuleman, A)
August 2, 2013
PDF | More
ORDER denying 57 Motion to Enforce Settlement or in the Alternative to Compel Responses to Post-Judgment Discovery signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/2/13. (Kaminski, H)
January 14, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/13/2014 ORDERING that Plaintiff's unopposed 63 motion to compel post-judgment discovery pursuant to the 66 judgment entered on 1/10/2014 is GRANTED. Defendant Creditors Specialty Service, Inc., shall respond to plaintiff's post-judgment discovery requests within fourteen days of the date of this order. (Zignago, K.)
April 21, 2014
PDF | More
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/18/14: Plaintiff's 68 MOTION to Show Cause is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as having been rendered moot by defendant's untimely production of post-judgment discovery responses; plaintiff's 68 Motion to Show Cause is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to plaintiff filing a motion to compel further responses based on defendant's inadequate or incomplete discovery responses, as well as without prejudice to plaintiff filing a motion for sanctions, brought separately or in conjunction with a motion to compel, based on defendant's failure to timely produce discovery responses pursuant to 67 Order; and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and/or for sanctions may be heard on shortened time and, if the parties cannot agree to a date for the hearing of plaintiff's motion to compel, plaintiff may file an ex parte request for an order shortening time. (Meuleman, A)